Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1472

reference
909-tree-1
name
1472
tree-preservation-order

undefined

909-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.046286 50.866899)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.046173 50.866887,-1.046178 50.866909,-1.046194 50.866929,-1.046219 50.866945,-1.046250 50.866956,-1.046285 50.866959,-1.046320 50.866956,-1.046352 50.866946,-1.046378 50.866930,-1.046394 50.866911,-1.046400 50.866888,-1.046395 50.866866,-1.046379 50.866846,-1.046355 50.866830,-1.046323 50.866819,-1.046288 50.866816,-1.046253 50.866819,-1.046221 50.866829,-1.046195 50.866844,-1.046179 50.866864,-1.046173 50.866887)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL